Indian Philosophy and Ethics: Dialogical Method as a Fresh Possibility
This paper discusses the positions held by two opposing campsthe traditionalists and the positivists (to use Pradeep Gokhale's typology) regarding the presence or absence of ethics in Indian philosophy. It subsequently offers a way ahead of the impasse where I consider some inputs inherent in...
| Publicado no: | Sophia |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Springer Netherlands
[2018]
|
| Em: |
Sophia
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | BK Hinduísmo KBM Ásia NCA Ética TK Período contemporâneo VA Filosofia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Ethics
B Other' B Dialogue B Indian ethics B Inter-religious B Pūrvapakṣa B Debate B Self B No-ethics |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Resumo: | This paper discusses the positions held by two opposing campsthe traditionalists and the positivists (to use Pradeep Gokhale's typology) regarding the presence or absence of ethics in Indian philosophy. It subsequently offers a way ahead of the impasse where I consider some inputs inherent in the method of dialogue in pre-modern Indian philosophy for imagining an ethics of and ethics for plurality. Such an ethics, I argue, cannot be imagined without involving the category of Other,' which has otherwise remained elusive in the Indian philosophical debates. The diverse nature of Indian societies demands Other-centric ethics to assess and evaluate the enduring moral crisis pervading contemporary times. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-018-0673-6 |