Indian Philosophy and Ethics: Dialogical Method as a Fresh Possibility
This paper discusses the positions held by two opposing campsthe traditionalists and the positivists (to use Pradeep Gokhale's typology) regarding the presence or absence of ethics in Indian philosophy. It subsequently offers a way ahead of the impasse where I consider some inputs inherent in...
| Publicado en: | Sophia |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
[2018]
|
| En: |
Sophia
|
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | BK Hinduismo KBM Asia NCA Ética TK Período contemporáneo VA Filosofía |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Ethics
B Other' B Dialogue B Indian ethics B Inter-religious B Pūrvapakṣa B Debate B Self B No-ethics |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Sumario: | This paper discusses the positions held by two opposing campsthe traditionalists and the positivists (to use Pradeep Gokhale's typology) regarding the presence or absence of ethics in Indian philosophy. It subsequently offers a way ahead of the impasse where I consider some inputs inherent in the method of dialogue in pre-modern Indian philosophy for imagining an ethics of and ethics for plurality. Such an ethics, I argue, cannot be imagined without involving the category of Other,' which has otherwise remained elusive in the Indian philosophical debates. The diverse nature of Indian societies demands Other-centric ethics to assess and evaluate the enduring moral crisis pervading contemporary times. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-018-0673-6 |