Scientism and Post-Truth
Initial findings, derived from data collected as part of a research project on autochthonous and trans-cultural Shamanism in Italy, suggest that there are two paradigms shaping the neo-shamanic experiential approach. I will start by clarifying the notion of paradigm as the founding basis of every re...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
British Association for the Study of Religions
[2018]
|
Dans: |
Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religions
Année: 2018, Volume: 20, Pages: 83-99 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Italie
/ Nouvelles religions
/ Chamanisme
/ Scientisme
|
Classifications IxTheo: | AG Vie religieuse AZ Nouveau mouvement religieux KBJ Italie |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Résumé: | Initial findings, derived from data collected as part of a research project on autochthonous and trans-cultural Shamanism in Italy, suggest that there are two paradigms shaping the neo-shamanic experiential approach. I will start by clarifying the notion of paradigm as the founding basis of every reasoning process, cultural production and hence religious movement. Then, I will argue that the Scientistic and Post-truth paradigms represent two founding bases of Neo-shamanism and its scholarly recognised traits and will conclude by addressing the issue of a potential contradiction between the two will be addressed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2516-6379 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religions
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.18792/jbasr.v20i0.30 |