Scientism and Post-Truth
Initial findings, derived from data collected as part of a research project on autochthonous and trans-cultural Shamanism in Italy, suggest that there are two paradigms shaping the neo-shamanic experiential approach. I will start by clarifying the notion of paradigm as the founding basis of every re...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
British Association for the Study of Religions
[2018]
|
| Dans: |
Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religions
Année: 2018, Volume: 20, Pages: 83-99 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Italie
/ Nouvelles religions
/ Chamanisme
/ Scientisme
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | AG Vie religieuse AZ Nouveau mouvement religieux KBJ Italie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Initial findings, derived from data collected as part of a research project on autochthonous and trans-cultural Shamanism in Italy, suggest that there are two paradigms shaping the neo-shamanic experiential approach. I will start by clarifying the notion of paradigm as the founding basis of every reasoning process, cultural production and hence religious movement. Then, I will argue that the Scientistic and Post-truth paradigms represent two founding bases of Neo-shamanism and its scholarly recognised traits and will conclude by addressing the issue of a potential contradiction between the two will be addressed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2516-6379 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religions
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.18792/jbasr.v20i0.30 |