Afterword: Religion in Public Institutions. Methodological Challenges, Institutional Comparisons, and Key Variables
This afterword offers some reflections on the methodological challenges of conducting research in public institutions, especially prisons and hospitals. I consider the need to take an interdisciplinary approach and to properly involve stakeholders. The second part of the discussion considers the pra...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publié: |
2018
|
Dans: |
Journal of religion in Europe
Année: 2018, Volume: 11, Numéro: 2/3, Pages: 186-194 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Établissement public
/ Religion
/ Science des religions
/ Méthode
|
Classifications IxTheo: | AA Sciences des religions AD Sociologie des religions ZB Sociologie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Qualitative Research
methodology
prisons
hospitals
institutions
religion
public
|
Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Maison d'édition) |
Résumé: | This afterword offers some reflections on the methodological challenges of conducting research in public institutions, especially prisons and hospitals. I consider the need to take an interdisciplinary approach and to properly involve stakeholders. The second part of the discussion considers the practical implications of being a researcher in an institution, including access, self-presentation, and reflexivity. Towards the end of the article, attention is paid to the way in which public institutions enable us to see new religious discourses in microcosm. |
---|---|
Description matérielle: | Online-Ressource |
ISSN: | 1874-8929 |
Contient: | In: Journal of religion in Europe
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18748929-01102006 |