Augustine's Punishments

During Augustine's life, government authorities were generally friendly to the Christianity he came to adopt and defend. His correspondence mentions one imperial magistrate in Africa, Virius Nicomachus Flavianus, a pagan vicar of Africa who seemed partial to Donatist Christians whom Augustine c...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Kaufman, Peter Iver 1946- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: [2016]
In: Harvard theological review
Anno: 2016, Volume: 109, Fascicolo: 4, Pagine: 550-566
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Augustinus, Aurelius, Santo 354-430 / Pena <motivo> / Potere dello stato / Politiche religiose
Notazioni IxTheo:CG Cristianesimo e politica
KAB Cristianesimo delle origini
NCD Etica politica
SA Diritto ecclesiastico
Accesso online: Volltext (Publisher)
Volltext (doi)
Edizione parallela:Non elettronico
Descrizione
Riepilogo:During Augustine's life, government authorities were generally friendly to the Christianity he came to adopt and defend. His correspondence mentions one imperial magistrate in Africa, Virius Nicomachus Flavianus, a pagan vicar of Africa who seemed partial to Donatist Christians whom Augustine considered secessionists. Otherwise, from the 390s to 430, assorted proconsuls, vicars, and tribunes sent from the imperial chancery and asked to maintain order in North Africa were willing to enforce government edicts against Donatists and pagans. To an extent, Augustine endorsed enforcement. He was troubled by punitive measures that looked excessive to him, yet scholars generally agree with Peter Burnell that Augustine unambiguously approved punitive judgments as an “unavoidable” necessity. But Burnell and others seem to make too much of it: Augustine's position on punishment supposedly indicates that he posited “an essential continuity” (rather than emphasized the contrast) between “any given state” and the celestial or “eschatological” city of God.
ISSN:1475-4517
Comprende:Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0017816016000274