Manuscript Transmission as Reception History: The Case of Ephrem the Syrian (d. 373)
In this article, I show how manuscript transmission can serve as a source for writing history and, more particularly, reception history. To illustrate this method, which falls within the broader approach of material, or new, philology, I have selected a case that involves the most important figure w...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
[2017]
|
| In: |
Journal of early Christian studies
Year: 2017, 卷: 25, 發布: 2, Pages: 281-306 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Ephraem, Syrus 306-373
/ 贊美詩
/ 基督論
/ 文本歷史
/ 接受
/ Syrien
/ 基督教
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CD Christianity and Culture KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity KBL Near East and North Africa NBF Christology |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| 總結: | In this article, I show how manuscript transmission can serve as a source for writing history and, more particularly, reception history. To illustrate this method, which falls within the broader approach of material, or new, philology, I have selected a case that involves the most important figure within Syriac Christianity, Ephrem the Syrian (d. 373). The manuscript transmission of Ephrem's works follow a clear pattern: Works that are preserved in complete form are found in fifth- or sixth-century manuscripts, whereas later manuscripts contain only excerpts of his works. Focusing on the hymns by Ephrem, I argue that one reason for this distribution is that some Syriac Christians living in the aftermath of the Christological controversies ceased copying parts of Ephrem's works due to their now problematic christological language. Thus, the picture of Ephrem that emerges in the later, liturgical manuscripts that include selections of Ephrem's hymns is one that has been filtered through subsequent theological developmentsand thereby sanitized. It is suggested that this case of Ephrem serves as a cautionary tale for the limits of our evidence for many ancient authors, since the texts that survive for any given author are often not a random sample but, instead, a deliberate selection. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1086-3184 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of early Christian studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/earl.2017.0022 |