Who Is Doing What to Whom Revisited: Another Look at Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13

According to the overwhelming majority of modern English Bible translations, the proscriptions of male-on-male sexual intercourse in Lev 18:22 and 20:13 appear to be directed to the activity of the insertive party, the few remaining versions simply proscribing male-on-male sex in such a general way...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Hollenback, George M. (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: [2017]
In: Journal of Biblical literature
Anno: 2017, Volume: 136, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 529-537
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Bibel. Levitikus 18,22 / Bibel. Levitikus 20,13 / Omosessualità / Divieto / Etica sessuale
Notazioni IxTheo:HB Antico Testamento
NCF Etica della sessualità
Altre parole chiave:B Theology
B Bible. Leviticus
B Sexual Intercourse
B Bible. Old Testament
B Gay men
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:According to the overwhelming majority of modern English Bible translations, the proscriptions of male-on-male sexual intercourse in Lev 18:22 and 20:13 appear to be directed to the activity of the insertive party, the few remaining versions simply proscribing male-on-male sex in such a general way that there is no indication one way or the other as to whose activity is being addressed. Jerome T. Walsh has challenged the status quo, however, persuasively arguing that, when correctly interpreted, the Hebrew text indicates that it is instead the activity of the receptive party that is being addressed (“Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13: Who Is Doing What to Whom?,” JBL 120 [2001]: 201-9). Building on the foundation laid by Walsh, the present work analyzes the two verses in their immediate Hebrew context and applies the same analysis to the earliest translations, the result being a validation of Walsh's contention that the proscriptions were indeed directed to the activity of the receptive rather than the insertive party.
ISSN:1934-3876
Comprende:Enthalten in: Journal of Biblical literature
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.15699/jbl.1363.2017.161166