The Eusebian and Meletian Roots of John Chrysostom’s Trinitarian Theology
Chrysostom has often been regarded as an Antiochene theologian, who is more a pastor and moralist than a serious theologian. When we study his Chrysostom’s Trinitarian doctrine, in the context of the Eusebian-Meletian traditions, a different picture emerges. Firstly, he has a well-thought-out theolo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2018
|
| In: |
Scrinium
Year: 2018, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 37-62 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBC Doctrine of God |
| Further subjects: | B
Chrysostom
Trinity
Meletian
Eusebian
School of Antioch
Diodore of Tarsus
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1581471181 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210730104122.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 181002s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/18177565-00141P05 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1581471181 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)511471181 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ511471181 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lai, Pak-Wah |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Eusebian and Meletian Roots of John Chrysostom’s Trinitarian Theology |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Chrysostom has often been regarded as an Antiochene theologian, who is more a pastor and moralist than a serious theologian. When we study his Chrysostom’s Trinitarian doctrine, in the context of the Eusebian-Meletian traditions, a different picture emerges. Firstly, he has a well-thought-out theological epistemology and structure. His prioritisation of faith before reason, doctrine of divine incomprehensibility, endorsement of the Nicene homoousios formula, and use of hypostatic language as a safeguard against Sabellianism are strong evidence that he was operating within the Eusebian-Meletian lineages. Secondly, the ease by which he uses Eusebian and Homoian expressions indicates that he has embraced Meletius’ reconciling stance. Most intriguingly, his Christological departure from Diodore calls into question his indebtedness to his teacher. When all these are taken into account, Chrysostom should be better understood as a Neo-Nicene Eusebian-Meletian theologian rather than a representative of the School of Antioch. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Chrysostom |x Trinity |x Meletian |x Eusebian |x School of Antioch |x Diodore of Tarsus | |
| 652 | |a KAB:NBC | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Scrinium |d Leiden : Brill, 2005 |g 14(2018), 1, Seite 37-62 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)599244291 |w (DE-600)2493502-5 |w (DE-576)454455119 |x 1817-7565 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:37-62 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18177565-00141P05 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 302751377X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1581471181 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210730104122 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 181002||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044284 |a KAB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||