Graciously commanded: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Karl Barth on the Decalogue
This essay examines and compares the treatment of the Decalogue in the theological ethics of Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. It argues that while both theologians orient their exposition of the Decalogue by attending to its primary character as divine self-revelation, approach it with a view to...
Pubblicato in: | Scottish journal of theology |
---|---|
Autore principale: | |
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2018]
|
In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Anno: 2018, Volume: 71, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 127-141 |
(sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Barth, Karl 1886-1968
/ Bonhoeffer, Dietrich 1906-1945
/ Dekalog
/ Legge (Teologia)
|
Notazioni IxTheo: | HB Antico Testamento KAJ Età contemporanea KDD Chiesa evangelica NBE Antropologia NCA Etica |
Altre parole chiave: | B
Karl Barth
B Dietrich Bonhoeffer B commandment B Decalogue B Law And Gospel |
Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Riepilogo: | This essay examines and compares the treatment of the Decalogue in the theological ethics of Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. It argues that while both theologians orient their exposition of the Decalogue by attending to its primary character as divine self-revelation, approach it with a view to a Christian ethics of divine command, and frame their understandings in decisively christological terms, they differ markedly on the extent to which the commandments themselves can and ought to be understood as representing concrete divine commands. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930618000030 |