Graciously commanded: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Karl Barth on the Decalogue
This essay examines and compares the treatment of the Decalogue in the theological ethics of Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. It argues that while both theologians orient their exposition of the Decalogue by attending to its primary character as divine self-revelation, approach it with a view to...
Publicado en: | Scottish journal of theology |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2018]
|
En: |
Scottish journal of theology
Año: 2018, Volumen: 71, Número: 2, Páginas: 127-141 |
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Barth, Karl 1886-1968
/ Bonhoeffer, Dietrich 1906-1945
/ Dekalog
/ Ley (Teología)
|
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | HB Antiguo Testamento KAJ Época contemporánea KDD Iglesia evangélica NBE Antropología NCA Ética |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Karl Barth
B Dietrich Bonhoeffer B commandment B Decalogue B Law And Gospel |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Sumario: | This essay examines and compares the treatment of the Decalogue in the theological ethics of Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. It argues that while both theologians orient their exposition of the Decalogue by attending to its primary character as divine self-revelation, approach it with a view to a Christian ethics of divine command, and frame their understandings in decisively christological terms, they differ markedly on the extent to which the commandments themselves can and ought to be understood as representing concrete divine commands. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930618000030 |