Graciously commanded: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Karl Barth on the Decalogue
This essay examines and compares the treatment of the Decalogue in the theological ethics of Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. It argues that while both theologians orient their exposition of the Decalogue by attending to its primary character as divine self-revelation, approach it with a view to...
Veröffentlicht in: | Scottish journal of theology |
---|---|
1. VerfasserIn: | |
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2018]
|
In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Jahr: 2018, Band: 71, Heft: 2, Seiten: 127-141 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Barth, Karl 1886-1968
/ Bonhoeffer, Dietrich 1906-1945
/ Dekalog
/ Gesetz (Theologie)
|
IxTheo Notationen: | HB Altes Testament KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit KDD Evangelische Kirche NBE Anthropologie NCA Ethik |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Karl Barth
B Dietrich Bonhoeffer B commandment B Decalogue B Law And Gospel |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Zusammenfassung: | This essay examines and compares the treatment of the Decalogue in the theological ethics of Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. It argues that while both theologians orient their exposition of the Decalogue by attending to its primary character as divine self-revelation, approach it with a view to a Christian ethics of divine command, and frame their understandings in decisively christological terms, they differ markedly on the extent to which the commandments themselves can and ought to be understood as representing concrete divine commands. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930618000030 |