Septuagint Figura: Assessing the Contribution of Richard B. Hays

This article offers a brief engagement with Richard B. Hays's 2014 book Reading Backwards, with occasional reference to its 2016 successor, Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels. Beginning with a genealogy of Hays's notion of figural exegesis, the article calls attention to the bold theologic...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Millay, Thomas J. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: [2017]
Dans: Scottish journal of theology
Année: 2017, Volume: 70, Numéro: 1, Pages: 93-104
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Hays, Richard B. 1948-2025 / Pères de l'Église / Bibel. Altes Testament / Bibel. Neues Testament / Typologie biblique
Classifications IxTheo:HB Ancien Testament
HC Nouveau Testament
KAB Christianisme primitif
KAJ Époque contemporaine
KDD Église protestante
Sujets non-standardisés:B Erich Auerbach
B Figural Reading
B Irenaeus of Lyons
B John David Dawson
B Hermeneutics
B Richard B. Hays
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Maison d'édition)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This article offers a brief engagement with Richard B. Hays's 2014 book Reading Backwards, with occasional reference to its 2016 successor, Echoes of Scripture in the Gospels. Beginning with a genealogy of Hays's notion of figural exegesis, the article calls attention to the bold theological claims that cash out his understanding of figural exegesis. It then proceeds to a critical dialogue that questions Hays' identification of his understanding of figural exegesis with that of the church fathers. Irenaeus and John David Dawson are drawn upon to argue for a significant difference between ancient practice and the post-critical hermeneutics evinced throughout Reading Backwards. The two approaches are by no means as easily drawn together as Hays seems to suggest, and the difference has significant implications for understanding the role God might play in how we relate the Old Testament to the New.
ISSN:1475-3065
Contient:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0036930616000491