Consideramus in speculo - fragments of a Hegelian mirror in dialectical theology
The article re-examines Karl Barth's claim that his 1931 book on Anselm of Canterbury's proof of the existence of God from Proslogion 2-4, the Fides Quaerens Intellectum, provides a vital key' for understanding the rationality of his later theology. The article takes up the question...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
[2015]
|
| Dans: |
Scottish journal of theology
Année: 2015, Volume: 68, Numéro: 4, Pages: 437-452 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Anselm, Canterbury, Erzbischof, Heiliger 1033-1109, Proslogion
/ Barth, Karl 1886-1968, Fides quaerens intellectum
/ Théologie dialectique
/ Analyse textuelle
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | FA Théologie KAE Moyen Âge central KAJ Époque contemporaine KDB Église catholique romaine KDD Église protestante |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theory
B speculative reading B Barth B Dialectics B Praxis B Anselm |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Maison d'édition) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1580706010 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180918113329.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180905s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S003693061500023X |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1580706010 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)510706010 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ510706010 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1049743644 |0 (DE-627)782575013 |0 (DE-576)403728258 |4 aut |a Baark, Sigurd | |
| 109 | |a Baark, Sigurd | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Consideramus in speculo - fragments of a Hegelian mirror in dialectical theology |c Sigurd Baark |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article re-examines Karl Barth's claim that his 1931 book on Anselm of Canterbury's proof of the existence of God from Proslogion 2-4, the Fides Quaerens Intellectum, provides a vital key' for understanding the rationality of his later theology. The article takes up the question of what dialectics' denotes in Barth's theology. Re-engaging the issue of dialectics in Karl Barth's theology, particularly in light of the developments of his thought, leads to a critical revision of Bruce McCormack's influential interpretation of Barth's dialectical theology.Through a close reading of the section, The manner of theology', from the first of the two parts of Fides Quaerens Intellectum the article sheds light on how Barth envisions the construction of the theoretical concepts of theology in light of his concrete exegetical praxis. By focusing on the relationship between theory and praxis, an understanding of Barth's dialectical theology as a form of speculative reading' emerges. This notion of dialectics as developing in light of a practice of speculative reading allows us to compare certain aspects of concept-formation in the theology of Karl Barth and the dialectical philosophy of the German Idealist, G. W. F. Hegel. Drawing explicitly on Hegel's analysis of infinite judgement from the second volume of his 1812 Science of Logic, Barth's use of the tautology God is God' in his second commentary on Romans from 1922 is shown to provide important insight into the structure of Barth's dialectical thinking. This explicitly relates to the important issue of the relationship between faith and reason in Karl Barth's theology, which sheds a new light on how his understanding of the rational basis of the theory and praxis of theology developed from his second Romans commentary onwards.Finally, Barth's use of dialectics and his account of the rationality of theology as a form of speculative reading' permits some final reflections on the significance of pneumatology for constructive theology by underscoring how Barth insists on the priority of praxis over theory. To understand Barth's theology and the way it changes over the years is to understand the rationality of its concrete praxis. | ||
| 601 | |a Fragment | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Anselm | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Barth | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dialectics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Praxis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a speculative reading | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theory | |
| 652 | |a FA:KAE:KAJ:KDB:KDD | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4264660-1 |0 (DE-627)10458565X |0 (DE-576)210624930 |a Anselm |2 gnd |c Canterbury, Erzbischof, Heiliger |d 1033-1109 |t Proslogion |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4522124-8 |0 (DE-627)25138070X |0 (DE-576)213280353 |a Barth, Karl |2 gnd |d 1886-1968 |t Fides quaerens intellectum |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4012059-4 |0 (DE-627)106350129 |0 (DE-576)208896686 |2 gnd |a Dialektische Theologie |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4194196-2 |0 (DE-627)104195959 |0 (DE-576)210092394 |2 gnd |a Textanalyse |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scottish journal of theology |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1948 |g 68(2015), 4, Seite 437-452 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)342893688 |w (DE-600)2072577-2 |w (DE-576)097935182 |x 1475-3065 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:68 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:437-452 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/scottish-journal-of-theology/article/consideramus-in-speculo-fragments-of-a-hegelian-mirror-in-dialectical-theology/FE4FF5CFF0AE711D6CA912A7E8B307BB |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S003693061500023X |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3024780475 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1580706010 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180918113112 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180905||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044020 |a FA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049839 |a KDB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044462 |a KAE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442050047 |a KDD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REF | |a Theorie-Praxis-Verhältnis | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Dialectical theology,Practice,Experience,Text analysis,Discourse analysis,Explication, Literary |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Analyse textuelle,Commentaire de texte,Praxis,Pratique,Pratique,Théologie dialectique |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Análisis de textos,Práctica,Teología dialéctica |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Analisi del testo,Prassi,Teologia dialettica |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 实践,文本分析,辩证神学 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 實踐,文本分析,辯證神學 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Análise de textos,Prática,Teologia dialética |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Анализ текста,Диалектическая теология,Практика |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ανάλυση κειμένου,Διαλεκτική θεολογία,Πράξη,Πρακτική |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Anselm,Anselmo,Anselmus,Cantuariensis, Anselmus,Anselmus,Ansshelmus Sankt,Canterbury, Anshelm von,Anselme,Anßhelmus,Anselmus,Anshelmus,Anßelmus,Anselmus,Ancelmus , Stadt Barth |
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Anselm,Canterbury, Erzbischof, Heiliger,1033-1109,Selbstgespräch,Anselm,Canterbury, Erzbischof, Heiliger,1033-1109,Kann Gottes Nicht-Sein gedacht werden?,Anselm,Canterbury, Erzbischof, Heiliger,1033-1109,Anrede , Diskursanalyse |
