Response to Michael Rea
For several years now, Michael Rea has been working to foster a fruitful discussion between theologians and analytic philosophers, and his article review nicely exemplifies those efforts. Rea recognises that he and I agree on several key points, the most important of which is that cataphatic theolo...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| 出版: |
[2015]
|
| In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2015, 卷: 68, 發布: 1, Pages: 80-82 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
神學家
/ 語言
/ 概念
|
| IxTheo Classification: | FA Theology VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
apophatic theology
B Concept B 標準 B Language B Predetermination B cataphatic theology |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| 總結: | For several years now, Michael Rea has been working to foster a fruitful discussion between theologians and analytic philosophers, and his article review nicely exemplifies those efforts. Rea recognises that he and I agree on several key points, the most important of which is that cataphatic theology can be done without idolatry or violence'. He wonders, though, whether Theology without Metaphysics succeeds in providing a model for such theology, since he thinks it is liable to several objections. By addressing them, I hope to demonstrate that my model is indeed viable, though I would be surprised if this were sufficient to persuade Professor Rea to adopt it. As I see it, more than one model, including Professor Rea's, may do justice to the relevant phenomena; here I want to argue, against Rea's criticisms, that mine does too. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Theology without idolatry or violence (2015)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S003693061400091X |
