Occult Spheres, Planes, and Dimensions: Geometric Terminology and Analogy in Modern Esoteric Discourse
This is an article on the history of religion and mathematics, which explores the origins and uses of geometric terminology in late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century esoteric discourses, and inquires as to whether or not such adaptions are instances of the discursive strategy identified by Ola...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| В: |
Journal of religious history
Год: 2016, Том: 40, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 385-404 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Спиритизм
/ Теософия
/ Оккультизм (мотив)
/ Swedenborg, Emanuel 1688-1772
/ Сциентизм
/ Сферическая геометрия
/ Терминология
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AF География религии AZ Новая религия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Religion and science
B Theosophy B religion and mathematics B esoteric discourse B Dimensions B planes B Spiritualism |
| Online-ссылка: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | This is an article on the history of religion and mathematics, which explores the origins and uses of geometric terminology in late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century esoteric discourses, and inquires as to whether or not such adaptions are instances of the discursive strategy identified by Olav Hammer as terminological scientism. For the situation regarding spheric terminology, I argue that the context is not scientistic, being rather an example of the decontextualised modern appropriation of antique terminologies. In the case of planar terminology, I conclude that while its origin with Emanuel Swedenborg as an adaption of anatomical vocabulary does indeed fit Hammer's definition of scientism, modern usage stripped the term of Swedenborg's scientistic rationale making the scientistic designation something of a vestigial atavism. In dealing with dimensional terminology, my conclusion is that from Johann Zöllner's initial formulation to the broader Spiritualistic and Theosophical applications, it exemplifies terminological scientism through and through. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9809 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious history
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/1467-9809.12302 |