Make no provision for the flesh: recognizing the incarnation in and after Augustine
This article argues for the importance of the intelligibility of the sexed body to incarnational theology. Building on Mark Jordan's reading of Augustine, I focus on the paradox of the incarnation as both the bodily sign (signa) of God and God Godself as the thing that the sign signifies (res)....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2018]
|
In: |
Theology & sexuality
Year: 2018, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-21 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Augustinus, Aurelius, Saint 354-430
/ Steinberg, Leo 1920-2011
/ Incarnation of Jesus Christ
/ Body
/ Sexuality
|
IxTheo Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NBE Anthropology NBF Christology NCF Sexual ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Augustine
B Incarnation B Mark Jordan B Chastity B Caroline Walker Bynum B Sexual Difference B Redemption B Leo Steinberg B genitality |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |