H. Richard Niebuhr's Reading of George Herbert Mead: Correcting, Completing, and Looking Ahead

In this essay, I reconstruct H. Richard Niebuhr's interpretation of George Herbert Mead's account of the social constitution of the self. Specifically, I correct Niebuhr's interpretation, because it mischaracterizes Mead's understanding of social constitution as more dialogical t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of religious ethics
Main Author: Daniel, Joshua M. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2016]
In: Journal of religious ethics
Further subjects:B George Herbert Mead
B social constitution
B H. Richard Niebuhr
B ecological / dialogical
B Conscience
B Self
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 158020936X
003 DE-627
005 20180820160538.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180820s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/jore.12133  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)158020936X 
035 |a (DE-576)51020936X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ51020936X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)110626200X  |0 (DE-627)86295455X  |0 (DE-576)473950049  |4 aut  |a Daniel, Joshua M. 
109 |a Daniel, Joshua M.  |a Daniel, Joshua 
245 1 0 |a H. Richard Niebuhr's Reading of George Herbert Mead  |b Correcting, Completing, and Looking Ahead  |c Joshua Daniel 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this essay, I reconstruct H. Richard Niebuhr's interpretation of George Herbert Mead's account of the social constitution of the self. Specifically, I correct Niebuhr's interpretation, because it mischaracterizes Mead's understanding of social constitution as more dialogical than ecological. I also argue that Niebuhr's interpretation needs completing because it fails to engage one of Mead's more significant notions, the I/me distinction within the self. By reconstructing Niebuhr's account of faith and responsibility as theologically self-constitutive through Mead's I/me distinction, I demonstrate Niebuhr's deep yet unacknowledged agreement with Mead: the self is constituted by its participation in multiple communities, but responds to them creatively by enduring the moral perplexity of competing communal claims. I conclude by initiating a constructive account of conscience that follows from this agreement. Conscience is more ecological than dialogical because it regards our creative participation in multiple ecologies of social roles oriented by patterns of responsive relations. 
601 |a Richard 
601 |a Niebuhr, Richard R. 
650 4 |a George Herbert Mead 
650 4 |a H. Richard Niebuhr 
650 4 |a Conscience 
650 4 |a dialogical/ecological 
650 4 |a Self 
650 4 |a social constitution 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 44(2016), 1, Seite 92-115  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:92-115 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12133  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12133  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 44  |j 2016  |e 1  |h 92-115 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3022667353 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 158020936X 
LOK |0 005 20180820154604 
LOK |0 008 180820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL