Sanctuary and the Limits of Public Reason: A Deweyan Corrective
This article contributes to the debate over the appropriate place of religion in public reason by showing the limits of this framework for understanding and evaluating the real-world religious political activism of social movements. Using the 1980s Sanctuary Movement as a central case study, I show...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2018]
|
| In: |
Politics and religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 11, Issue: 3, Pages: 498-521 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1578382211 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230801145545.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180808s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S1755048317000682 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1578382211 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)508382211 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ508382211 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Steinmetz, Alicia |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sanctuary and the Limits of Public Reason |b A Deweyan Corrective |c Alicia Steinmetz |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2018] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article contributes to the debate over the appropriate place of religion in public reason by showing the limits of this framework for understanding and evaluating the real-world religious political activism of social movements. Using the 1980s Sanctuary Movement as a central case study, I show how public reason fails to appreciate the complex religious dynamics of this movement, the reasons actors employ religious reasoning, and, as a result, the very meaning of these acts. In response, I argue that a Deweyan perspective on the tasks and challenges of the democratic public offers a richer, more contextualized approach to evaluating the status of religion in the public sphere as well as other emerging publics whose modes of engagement defy prevailing notions of reasonableness and civility. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Politics and religion |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008 |g 11(2018), 3, Seite 498-521 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)560846134 |w (DE-600)2417736-2 |w (DE-576)29433923X |x 1755-0491 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2018 |g number:3 |g pages:498-521 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/sanctuary-and-the-limits-of-public-reason-a-deweyan-corrective/CEA2660EC2C31F2AC3FB83515538DF5A |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048317000682 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 11 |j 2018 |e 3 |h 498-521 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3020435935 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1578382211 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180808132213 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||