Then and Now - A Thomistic Account of History
Thomists do not have a standard account of history as a discipline or of historical knowledge in general. Since Thomism is a tradition of thought derived in part from historical figures and their works, it is necessary for Thomists to be able to say how we know what we know about those figures and t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[2016]
|
In: |
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Year: 2016, Volume: 90, Pages: 243-259 |
IxTheo Classification: | KDB Roman Catholic Church TA History VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1578187192 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20181123105129.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180802s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpaproc20181369 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1578187192 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)508187192 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ508187192 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kearns, Timothy |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Then and Now - A Thomistic Account of History |c Timothy Kearns |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Thomists do not have a standard account of history as a discipline or of historical knowledge in general. Since Thomism is a tradition of thought derived in part from historical figures and their works, it is necessary for Thomists to be able to say how we know what we know about those figures and their works. In this paper, I analyze the notion of history both in its key contemporary senses and in how it was used by Aristotle and Aquinas. I show briefly how intellectual knowledge of the past is possible. Then, I argue that the Thomistic tradition implies a far wider notion of history than is generally recognized, history as study of the past in general, not a science in itself, but an aspect of other sciences. Finally, I indicate how this wider notion of history relates to the ordinary sense of history as an inquiry into the specifically human past and then how such an account fits within contemporary Thomism. | ||
601 | |a Historie | ||
652 | |a KDB:TA:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American Catholic Philosophical Association |t Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |d Washington, DC, 1926 |g 90(2016), Seite 243-259 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)376274395 |w (DE-600)2130243-1 |w (DE-576)443083517 |x 2153-7925 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:90 |g year:2016 |g pages:243-259 |
856 | |u https://philarchive.org/rec/KEATAN |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=acpaproc_2016_0090_0243_0259&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc20181369 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 90 |j 2016 |h 243-259 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3020078326 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1578187192 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20181123105129 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180802||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049839 |a KDB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053402 |a TA | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |