Thomas Aquinas and Francisco Suarez on the Problem of Concurrence
Thomas and Suarez understand God's creation and conservation in a similar way: as God's continually giving being to all creatures. The two philosophers also try to explain the way in which creaturely, secondary causality is guaranteed, but they do so in radically different ways. Suarez...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[2016]
|
In: |
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Year: 2016, Volume: 90, Pages: 149-161 |
IxTheo Classification: | KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KDB Roman Catholic Church NBD Doctrine of Creation VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1578187117 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180802102839.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180802s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpaproc2017103064 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1578187117 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)508187117 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ508187117 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1017738297 |0 (DE-627)690417403 |0 (DE-576)354252739 |4 aut |a Baldner, Steven E. |d 1951- | |
109 | |a Baldner, Steven E. 1951- |a Baldner, Steven Earl 1951- |a Baldner, Steven 1951- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Thomas Aquinas and Francisco Suarez on the Problem of Concurrence |c Steven Baldner |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Thomas and Suarez understand God's creation and conservation in a similar way: as God's continually giving being to all creatures. The two philosophers also try to explain the way in which creaturely, secondary causality is guaranteed, but they do so in radically different ways. Suarez's doctrine of concurrence is not a progressive development of Thomas's doctrine of secondary, instrumental causality, with which this Suarezian innovation is incompatible. I try to show how different concurrentism is from Thomas's doctrine of secondary causality and to offer some criticism of the former by the latter. | ||
601 | |a Suárez, Francisco | ||
601 | |a Problem | ||
652 | |a KAE:KAH:KDB:NBD:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American Catholic Philosophical Association |t Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |d Washington, DC, 1926 |g 90(2016), Seite 149-161 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)376274395 |w (DE-600)2130243-1 |w (DE-576)443083517 |x 2153-7925 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:90 |g year:2016 |g pages:149-161 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=acpaproc_2016_0090_0149_0161&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc2017103064 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 90 |j 2016 |h 149-161 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3020078253 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1578187117 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20181123103533 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180802||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049839 |a KDB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051531 |a NBD | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044462 |a KAE | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044624 |a KAH | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |