Thomas Aquinas and Francisco Suarez on the Problem of Concurrence

Thomas and Suarez understand God's creation and conservation in a similar way: as God's continually giving being to all creatures. The two philosophers also try to explain the way in which creaturely, secondary causality is guaranteed, but they do so in radically different ways. Suarez...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baldner, Steven E. 1951- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [2016]
In: Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Year: 2016, Volume: 90, Pages: 149-161
IxTheo Classification:KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
KDB Roman Catholic Church
NBD Doctrine of Creation
VA Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1578187117
003 DE-627
005 20180802102839.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180802s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/acpaproc2017103064  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1578187117 
035 |a (DE-576)508187117 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ508187117 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1017738297  |0 (DE-627)690417403  |0 (DE-576)354252739  |4 aut  |a Baldner, Steven E.  |d 1951- 
109 |a Baldner, Steven E. 1951-  |a Baldner, Steven Earl 1951-  |a Baldner, Steven 1951- 
245 1 0 |a Thomas Aquinas and Francisco Suarez on the Problem of Concurrence  |c Steven Baldner 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Thomas and Suarez understand God's creation and conservation in a similar way: as God's continually giving being to all creatures. The two philosophers also try to explain the way in which creaturely, secondary causality is guaranteed, but they do so in radically different ways. Suarez's doctrine of concurrence is not a progressive development of Thomas's doctrine of secondary, instrumental causality, with which this Suarezian innovation is incompatible. I try to show how different concurrentism is from Thomas's doctrine of secondary causality and to offer some criticism of the former by the latter. 
601 |a Suárez, Francisco 
601 |a Problem 
652 |a KAE:KAH:KDB:NBD:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a American Catholic Philosophical Association  |t Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association  |d Washington, DC, 1926  |g 90(2016), Seite 149-161  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)376274395  |w (DE-600)2130243-1  |w (DE-576)443083517  |x 2153-7925  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:90  |g year:2016  |g pages:149-161 
856 4 0 |u http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=acpaproc_2016_0090_0149_0161&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc2017103064  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 90  |j 2016  |h 149-161 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3020078253 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1578187117 
LOK |0 005 20181123103533 
LOK |0 008 180802||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442049839  |a KDB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051531  |a NBD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044462  |a KAE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044624  |a KAH 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL