On the East Iranian Genitive Plural Ending
The Khotanese and Sogdian genitive plural endings cannot be satisfactorily explained from the traditionally posited ending *-nām. Instead, Khotanese -nu and Sogdian -nw point to *-nam. Instead of assuming a special rule that shortens the expected *-nām to *-nam, it is argued that the evidence from E...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 电子 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| 出版: |
2018
|
| In: |
Indo-Iranian journal
Year: 2018, 卷: 61, 发布: 2, Pages: 118-130 |
| Further subjects: | B
Indo-Iranian reconstruction
historical morphology
genitive plural
East Iranian
Proto-Indo-European
|
| 在线阅读: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Publisher) |
| 总结: | The Khotanese and Sogdian genitive plural endings cannot be satisfactorily explained from the traditionally posited ending *-nām. Instead, Khotanese -nu and Sogdian -nw point to *-nam. Instead of assuming a special rule that shortens the expected *-nām to *-nam, it is argued that the evidence from East Iranian is to be taken at face value. A short ending *-om can be reconstructed for Proto-Indo-European as well and the East Iranian reflexes of a short ending are probably an archaism. |
|---|---|
| 实物描述: | Online-Ressource |
| ISSN: | 1572-8536 |
| Contains: | In: Indo-Iranian journal
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15728536-06102003 HDL: 1887/3202762 |
