Do We Believe in Consequences? Revisiting the “Incoherence Objection” to Penal Substitution
Among recent assessments of penal substitutionary accounts of atonement one significant critique is Mark Murphy’s “incoherence objection.” In this essay I express general agreement with Murphy’s critique of penal substitution, yet I suggest that there is a way to reconceive the doctrine of atonement...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2018
|
In: |
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Year: 2018, Volume: 60, Issue: 2, Pages: 208-228 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Punishment
/ Atoning death
/ Representation (Theology)
|
IxTheo Classification: | NBF Christology NBM Doctrine of Justification |
Further subjects: | B
Sühnelehre
Konsequenzen
Forensische Stellvertretung
Bestrafung
Einheit mit Christus
B Atonement Consequences Penal Substitution Punishment Union with Christ |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |