Do We Believe in Consequences? Revisiting the “Incoherence Objection” to Penal Substitution
Among recent assessments of penal substitutionary accounts of atonement one significant critique is Mark Murphy’s “incoherence objection.” In this essay I express general agreement with Murphy’s critique of penal substitution, yet I suggest that there is a way to reconceive the doctrine of atonement...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2018
|
| In: |
Neue Zeitschrift für systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Year: 2018, Volume: 60, Issue: 2, Pages: 208-228 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Punishment
/ Atoning death
/ Vicarious role (Theology)
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NBF Christology NBM Doctrine of Justification |
| Further subjects: | B
Sühnelehre
Konsequenzen
Forensische Stellvertretung
Bestrafung
Einheit mit Christus
B Atonement Consequences Penal Substitution Punishment Union with Christ |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |