Dialogue or proclamation? Communication ethics and the problem of persuasion in mission
This article utilizes the field of communication ethics to sharpen a critique of a form of interreligious dialogue that de-emphasizes the necessity of proclamation, as well as to provide helpful tools to recover a notion of proclamation that acknowledges its persuasive and purgative aspects. The art...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
[2017]
|
In: |
Missiology
Jahr: 2017, Band: 45, Heft: 3, Seiten: 336-348 |
IxTheo Notationen: | CC Christentum und nichtchristliche Religionen; interreligiöse Beziehungen KDJ Ökumene NCA Ethik RJ Mission; Missionswissenschaft |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Augustine
B Proclamation B invitational rhetoric B Communication ethics B Rhetoric B John Cobb B Interreligious Dialogue B Mission B Persuasion B Missiology |
Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Zusammenfassung: | This article utilizes the field of communication ethics to sharpen a critique of a form of interreligious dialogue that de-emphasizes the necessity of proclamation, as well as to provide helpful tools to recover a notion of proclamation that acknowledges its persuasive and purgative aspects. The article begins by showing how a particular form of communication ethic, invitational rhetoric, coheres with a form of interreligious dialogue promoted by John Cobb. Such cohesion will enable a critique of interreligious dialogue utilizing similar critiques levied at invitational rhetoric. Following this critique will be a brief recovery and strengthening of a notion of proclamation as persuasion and purgation, with the aid of portions of Augustine's and Kenneth Burke's rhetorical theories. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2051-3623 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Missiology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0091829617696338 |