Most Peers Don't Believe It, Hence It Is Probably False

Rob Lovering has recently argued that since theists have been unable, by means of philosophical arguments, to convince 85 percent of professional philosophers that God exists, at least one of their defining beliefs must be either false or meaningless. This paper is a critical examination of his argu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Woudenberg, René van 1957- (Author)
Contributors: Eyghen, Hans van ca. 21. Jh. (Other)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2017]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 9, Issue: 4, Pages: 87-112
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Lovering, Rob / Theism / Proof of God's existence / Criticism
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B peer disagreement
B arguments for God's existence
B Lovering
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1575279215
003 DE-627
005 20200508084915.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180517s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.v9i4.1987  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1575279215 
035 |a (DE-576)505279215 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ505279215 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)173741355  |0 (DE-627)698646932  |0 (DE-576)134582233  |4 aut  |a Woudenberg, René van  |d 1957- 
109 |a Woudenberg, René van 1957-  |a Van Woudenberg, René 1957- 
245 1 0 |a Most Peers Don't Believe It, Hence It Is Probably False  |c René van Woudenberg 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Rob Lovering has recently argued that since theists have been unable, by means of philosophical arguments, to convince 85 percent of professional philosophers that God exists, at least one of their defining beliefs must be either false or meaningless. This paper is a critical examination of his argument. First we present Lovering's argument and point out its salient features. Next we explain why the argument's conclusion is entirely acceptable for theists, even if, as we show, there are multiple problems with the premises. 
650 4 |a arguments for God's existence 
650 4 |a Lovering 
650 4 |a peer disagreement 
652 |a AB:NBC 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)103192860X  |0 (DE-627)737566779  |0 (DE-576)37963449X  |2 gnd  |a Lovering, Rob 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059729-5  |0 (DE-627)10614250X  |0 (DE-576)209131942  |2 gnd  |a Theismus 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4021668-8  |0 (DE-627)10440972X  |0 (DE-576)208939288  |2 gnd  |a Gottesbeweis 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4033229-9  |0 (DE-627)104137800  |0 (DE-576)209000694  |2 gnd  |a Kritik 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
700 1 |0 (DE-588)1179841999  |0 (DE-627)1067518797  |0 (DE-576)518377679  |4 oth  |a Eyghen, Hans van  |d ca. 21. Jh. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 9(2017), 4, Seite 87-112  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:9  |g year:2017  |g number:4  |g pages:87-112 
856 |u https://research.vu.nl/files/280374115/Most_Peers_Don_t_Believe_It_Hence_It_Is_Probably_False.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1987  |x Verlag  |z teilw. kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i4.1987  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3009734352 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1575279215 
LOK |0 005 20180813100954 
LOK |0 008 180517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Criticism,Criticism,Proof of God's existence,God,Existence of God,God's existence,Theism 
STB 0 0 |a Critique,Critique,Preuve de l’existence de Dieu,Théisme 
STC 0 0 |a Crítica,Crítica,Prueba de la existencia de Dios,Teísmo 
STD 0 0 |a Critica,Critica,Prova dell'esistenza di Dio,Teismo 
STE 0 0 |a 批评,批判,评论,有神论,神存在的论证,上帝存在的论证 
STF 0 0 |a 批評,批判,評論,有神論,神存在的論証,上帝存在的論証 
STG 0 0 |a Crítica,Crítica,Prova da existência de Deus,Teísmo 
STH 0 0 |a Доказательство существования Бога,Критика (мотив),Критика,Теизм 
STI 0 0 |a Απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού,Θεϊσμός,Κριτική (μοτίβο),Κριτική 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Lovering, Robert,Lovering, Robert P. , Gott 

Similar Items

more