Most Peers Don't Believe It, Hence It Is Probably False
Rob Lovering has recently argued that since theists have been unable, by means of philosophical arguments, to convince 85 percent of professional philosophers that God exists, at least one of their defining beliefs must be either false or meaningless. This paper is a critical examination of his argu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2017]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 9, Issue: 4, Pages: 87-112 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Lovering, Rob
/ Theism
/ Proof of God's existence
/ Criticism
|
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Further subjects: | B
peer disagreement
B arguments for God's existence B Lovering |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1575279215 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200508084915.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180517s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v9i4.1987 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1575279215 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)505279215 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ505279215 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)173741355 |0 (DE-627)698646932 |0 (DE-576)134582233 |4 aut |a Woudenberg, René van |d 1957- | |
109 | |a Woudenberg, René van 1957- |a Van Woudenberg, René 1957- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Most Peers Don't Believe It, Hence It Is Probably False |c René van Woudenberg |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Rob Lovering has recently argued that since theists have been unable, by means of philosophical arguments, to convince 85 percent of professional philosophers that God exists, at least one of their defining beliefs must be either false or meaningless. This paper is a critical examination of his argument. First we present Lovering's argument and point out its salient features. Next we explain why the argument's conclusion is entirely acceptable for theists, even if, as we show, there are multiple problems with the premises. | ||
650 | 4 | |a arguments for God's existence | |
650 | 4 | |a Lovering | |
650 | 4 | |a peer disagreement | |
652 | |a AB:NBC | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)103192860X |0 (DE-627)737566779 |0 (DE-576)37963449X |2 gnd |a Lovering, Rob |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4021668-8 |0 (DE-627)10440972X |0 (DE-576)208939288 |2 gnd |a Gottesbeweis |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4033229-9 |0 (DE-627)104137800 |0 (DE-576)209000694 |2 gnd |a Kritik |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
700 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1179841999 |0 (DE-627)1067518797 |0 (DE-576)518377679 |4 oth |a Eyghen, Hans van |d ca. 21. Jh. | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 9(2017), 4, Seite 87-112 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g pages:87-112 |
856 | |u https://research.vu.nl/files/280374115/Most_Peers_Don_t_Believe_It_Hence_It_Is_Probably_False.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1987 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i4.1987 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3009734352 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1575279215 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180813100954 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180517||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Criticism,Criticism,Proof of God's existence,God,Existence of God,God's existence,Theism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Critique,Critique,Preuve de l’existence de Dieu,Théisme |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Crítica,Crítica,Prueba de la existencia de Dios,Teísmo |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Critica,Critica,Prova dell'esistenza di Dio,Teismo |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 批评,批判,评论,有神论,神存在的论证,上帝存在的论证 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 批評,批判,評論,有神論,神存在的論証,上帝存在的論証 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Crítica,Crítica,Prova da existência de Deus,Teísmo |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Доказательство существования Бога,Критика (мотив),Критика,Теизм |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Απόδειξη της ύπαρξης του Θεού,Θεϊσμός,Κριτική (μοτίβο),Κριτική |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Lovering, Robert,Lovering, Robert P. , Gott |