Response to Review Panelists

This article consists of replies to the reviewers. For Ambasciano I show that his concern about the taint of epistemic phenomenologies can be largely deflected by understanding the exact contextualization of the materials he questions, particularly their place in the function, structure and serializ...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: Paden, William E. 1939- (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Brill 2018
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2018, 卷: 30, 發布: 2, Pages: 165-172
IxTheo Classification:AA Study of religion
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
AE Psychology of religion
Further subjects:B 進化 natural history world-making function comparativism
在線閱讀: Volltext (Verlag)
實物特徵
總結:This article consists of replies to the reviewers. For Ambasciano I show that his concern about the taint of epistemic phenomenologies can be largely deflected by understanding the exact contextualization of the materials he questions, particularly their place in the function, structure and serialized nature of the argument. Responding to Segal I try to clarify the evolutionary role of functionalism, the relation of Durkheim and Eliade as I am using them, and the role of difference in comparativism. Willard’s questions about the relations of my natural history approach to the cultural evolution model provides a good opportunity to point out their complementarity and differences.
ISSN:1570-0682
Contains:In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341418