Response to Walter Moberly's "Theological Thinking and the Reading of Scripture"
This article is a response to Walter Moberly's critical appraisal of my interpretation of Rom 9-11.¹ It seeks, on the one hand, to locate more specifically the hermeneutical disagreement between Moberly and me, concluding that Moberly (unlike me) continues to privilege historically "origin...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Другие авторы: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2016
|
| В: |
Journal of theological interpretation
Год: 2016, Том: 10, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 117-123 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | HA Библия NBD Сотворение мира VB Герменевтика ; Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Theology
B Love B Bible B Redaction B Interpretive communities B Observational frames of reference B Old Testament B Torah B Jewish History B Vocation |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | This article is a response to Walter Moberly's critical appraisal of my interpretation of Rom 9-11.¹ It seeks, on the one hand, to locate more specifically the hermeneutical disagreement between Moberly and me, concluding that Moberly (unlike me) continues to privilege historically "original" meaning. It argues, on the other hand, for a relational hermeneutic that enables creation ex nihilo to function as a valid interpretational frame of reference (for both Rom 9-11 and Deut 32), thus addressing Moberly's charge of "anachronism." |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2576-7933 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Theological Thinking and the Reading of Scripture (2016)"
|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal of theological interpretation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/26373990 |
