Patterns of Ministry of Clergy Married to Clergy in the Church of England
This article argues that for good practice, well-being and fruitful ministry, decisions by and about clergy married to clergy (CMC) in the Church of England require a clear quantitative picture of their ministry, and offers such a picture in early 2013 drawn primarily from published data, compared w...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
Em: |
Journal of Anglican studies
Ano: 2015, Volume: 13, Número: 1, Páginas: 68-91 |
Classificações IxTheo: | FD Teologia contextual KDE Igreja anglicana RB Ministério eclesiástico |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Chaplaincy
B Couples B clergy married to clergy B ministry patterns B Church of England B Gender inequality B Clergy |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Resumo: | This article argues that for good practice, well-being and fruitful ministry, decisions by and about clergy married to clergy (CMC) in the Church of England require a clear quantitative picture of their ministry, and offers such a picture in early 2013 drawn primarily from published data, compared with national Church of England statistics. Over 26 per cent more clergy dyads were found than previously thought, with many active in ministry. A wide variety of ministry patterns were identified, including a higher than normal percentage in non-parochial roles, supporting previous research noting high levels of boundary enmeshment and absorptiveness. Considerable gender inequality prevailed in shared parochial settings in spite of women having been ordained priest for nearly 20 years, with very few wives holding more senior positions than their husbands, while female CMC are more likely to be dignitaries than other ordained women. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5278 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Journal of Anglican studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S1740355314000205 |