Theologische Thomasforschung im englischen und deutschen Sprachraum
Since the mid-twen tieth century, the theology of Thomas Aquinas has not been taken into much account in fundamental and dogmatic theologies. During the past two decades, however, a Thomistic renaissance has developed in English-speaking theology. First, this article distinguishes and portrays four...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Review |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Herder
2017
|
| In: |
Theologie und Philosophie
Year: 2017, Volume: 92, Issue: 4, Pages: 577-583 |
| Review of: | The Cambridge companion to the Summa theologiae (Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2016) (Knorn, Bernhard)
Thomas Handbuch (Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2016) (Knorn, Bernhard) |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274
/ Theology
/ Research
/ History 1930-2016
|
| IxTheo Classification: | FA Theology KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages KDB Roman Catholic Church |
| Further subjects: | B
Literature report 1974-2016
B Book review |
| Rights Information: | InC 1.0 |
| Summary: | Since the mid-twen tieth century, the theology of Thomas Aquinas has not been taken into much account in fundamental and dogmatic theologies. During the past two decades, however, a Thomistic renaissance has developed in English-speaking theology. First, this article distinguishes and portrays four different approaches taken by scholars who share this new interest in Thomas Aquinas. Second, a critical review of two recent (2016) handbooks on Aquinas helps us to compare with each other current Thomas scholarship in the English- and German-speaking worlds. The two books are The Cambridge Com panion to the Summa Theologiae, edited by Philip McCosker and Denys Turner, and theThomas Handbuch, edited by Volker Leppin. As a result, what is often an immediate approach to the texts of Aquinas contrasts with an interpretation that has been formed by historical research. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0040-5655 |
| Contains: | In: Theologie und Philosophie
|