Physiologies of eros: a response to Fiona Ellis
In her article, Two erotic ideals', Fiona Ellis offers a sustained critique of my interpretation of Nietzschean eroticism. In the following piece, I respond to her criticism by proposing a shift in emphasis away from erotic ideals' and towards a greater attentiveness to the physiological...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
[2016]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Anno: 2016, Volume: 52, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 263-272 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844-1900
/ Eros (Concetto)
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | VA Filosofia |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Riepilogo: | In her article, Two erotic ideals', Fiona Ellis offers a sustained critique of my interpretation of Nietzschean eroticism. In the following piece, I respond to her criticism by proposing a shift in emphasis away from erotic ideals' and towards a greater attentiveness to the physiological states that condition our desire. I argue that such a move allows us to see how questions about eroticism and questions about nihilism are in fact integrally connected. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412515000153 |