Physiologies of eros: a response to Fiona Ellis
In her article, Two erotic ideals', Fiona Ellis offers a sustained critique of my interpretation of Nietzschean eroticism. In the following piece, I respond to her criticism by proposing a shift in emphasis away from erotic ideals' and towards a greater attentiveness to the physiological...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
[2016]
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Religious studies
Έτος: 2016, Τόμος: 52, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 263-272 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844-1900
/ Έρως (έννοια) (Έννοια)
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | VA Φιλοσοφία |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
| Σύνοψη: | In her article, Two erotic ideals', Fiona Ellis offers a sustained critique of my interpretation of Nietzschean eroticism. In the following piece, I respond to her criticism by proposing a shift in emphasis away from erotic ideals' and towards a greater attentiveness to the physiological states that condition our desire. I argue that such a move allows us to see how questions about eroticism and questions about nihilism are in fact integrally connected. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412515000153 |