The Open Future Square of Opposition: a Defense
This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bival...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publicado em: |
[2017]
|
Em: |
Sophia
Ano: 2017, Volume: 56, Número: 4, Páginas: 573-587 |
Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião NBC Deus VA Filosofia |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Molinism
B Open Theism B Gregory Boyd B Open future B William Lane Craig |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Publisher) Volltext (doi) |
Resumo: | This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bivalence and a classical conception of omniscience. In what follows, I argue that it can. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-930X |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-016-0558-5 |