The Open Future Square of Opposition: a Defense
This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bival...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
[2017]
|
| Dans: |
Sophia
Année: 2017, Volume: 56, Numéro: 4, Pages: 573-587 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBC Dieu VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Molinism
B Open Theism B Gregory Boyd B Open future B William Lane Craig |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Maison d'édition) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This essay explores the validity of Gregory Boyd's open theistic account of the nature of the future. In particular, it is an investigation into whether Boyd's logical square of opposition for future contingents provides a model of reality for free will theists that can preserve both bivalence and a classical conception of omniscience. In what follows, I argue that it can. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-016-0558-5 |
