Compatibility of the “Inner Light” of Mystics and Reason

Following his conviction that the truth, in principle, could only be one truth, Leibniz wanted to prove that the “inner Light” of “true mysticism” was compatible with philosophers’ insights into reason. He placed his own doctrine of the individual substances (“Monadology”) in the tradition of philos...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Edel, Susanne 1959- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2018
In: Aries
Year: 2018, Volume: 18, Issue: 1, Pages: 75-95
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Böhme, Jakob 1575-1624 / Reception / Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm 1646-1716 / Monadic theory / Philosophia perennis / Morell, Andreas 1646-1703 / Mysticism / Enlightenment
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AZ New religious movements
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Jacob Böhme Leibniz Cambridge Platonists Philosophia perennis theosophy Christian Kabbala
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1568106203
003 DE-627
005 20200618165053.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180206s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15700593-01801003  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1568106203 
035 |a (DE-576)498106209 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ498106209 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)1044909498  |0 (DE-627)773100687  |0 (DE-576)398191646  |4 aut  |a Edel, Susanne  |d 1959- 
109 |a Edel, Susanne 1959- 
245 1 0 |a Compatibility of the “Inner Light” of Mystics and Reason 
264 1 |c 2018 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Following his conviction that the truth, in principle, could only be one truth, Leibniz wanted to prove that the “inner Light” of “true mysticism” was compatible with philosophers’ insights into reason. He placed his own doctrine of the individual substances (“Monadology”) in the tradition of philosophia perennis, and in his opinion “true” mysticism belonged to this same tradition. Through representatives of the so-called Christian Kabbala, which made Jewish and Christian mysticism part of the same lineage, Leibniz became aware of the controversial writings of Böhme. He discussed the theosopher’s thought with his correspondence partner, the Böhme adherent André Morell, and after a critical investigation, Leibniz placed Böhme in a tradition of “true mysticism” which could be measured against reason. The author posits that the result of this engagement was Leibniz’s treatise “True Mystical Theology”, a translation of his doctrine of monads in mystical terminology. 
650 4 |a Jacob Böhme  |x Leibniz  |x Cambridge Platonists  |x Philosophia perennis  |x theosophy  |x Christian Kabbala 
652 |a AB:AZ:KAH:VA 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118512579  |0 (DE-627)135631068  |0 (DE-576)208870415  |2 gnd  |a Böhme, Jakob  |d 1575-1624 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049716-1  |0 (DE-627)104675152  |0 (DE-576)209083182  |2 gnd  |a Rezeption 
689 0 2 |d p  |0 (DE-588)118571249  |0 (DE-627)133415066  |0 (DE-576)161947816  |2 gnd  |a Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm  |d 1646-1716 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4130714-8  |0 (DE-627)105700444  |0 (DE-576)209621311  |2 gnd  |a Monadenlehre 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4174277-1  |0 (DE-627)105373516  |0 (DE-576)209955872  |2 gnd  |a Philosophia perennis 
689 0 5 |d p  |0 (DE-588)128493348  |0 (DE-627)373915101  |0 (DE-576)297177141  |2 gnd  |a Morell, Andreas  |d 1646-1703 
689 0 6 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4114660-8  |0 (DE-627)105820555  |0 (DE-576)20948649X  |2 gnd  |a Mystizismus 
689 0 7 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4003524-4  |0 (DE-627)104306831  |0 (DE-576)208851976  |2 gnd  |a Aufklärung 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Aries  |d Leiden : Brill, 2001  |g 18(2018), 1, Seite 75-95  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)349880581  |w (DE-600)2082129-3  |w (DE-576)10940324X  |x 1570-0593  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2018  |g number:1  |g pages:75-95 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700593-01801003  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 18  |j 2018  |e 1  |h 75-95 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2995328570 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1568106203 
LOK |0 005 20200618165053 
LOK |0 008 180206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043326  |a AZ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044624  |a KAH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Enlightenment,Solution,Enlightenment,Monadic theory,Mysticism,Philosophia perennis,Perennial philosophy,Reception,Reception,Impact,Afterlife 
STB 0 0 |a Doctrine des monades,Monadologie,Monadologie,Lumières,Résolution,Lumières,Mysticisme,Philosophia perennis,Réception <scientifique>,Réception <scientifique>,Influence intellectuelle,Influence intellectuelle,Influence intellectuelle (motif),Influence intellectuelle 
STC 0 0 |a Doctrina de las mónadas,Iluminismo,Resolución,Iluminismo,Misticismo,Philosophia perennis,Recepción,Recepción 
STD 0 0 |a Dottrina delle monadi,Illuminismo,Investigazione <criminologia>,Illuminismo,Risoluzione di casi (criminologia),Risoluzione di casi,Misticismo,Philosophia perennis,Ricezione,Ricezione 
STE 0 0 |a 启蒙时代,启蒙运动,接受,接收,神秘主义,长青哲学 
STF 0 0 |a 啟蒙時代,啟蒙運動,接受,接收,神秘主義,長青哲學 
STG 0 0 |a Doutrina das mônadas,Iluminismo,Resolução,Iluminismo,Misticismo,Philosophia perennis,Recepção,Recepção 
STH 0 0 |a Philosophia perennis,Восприятие (мотив),Восприятие,Мистицизм,Монадология,Просвещение (мотив),Раскрытие преступления,Эпоха Просвещения 
STI 0 0 |a Philosophia perennis,Αιώνια φιλοσοφία,Αποδοχή (μοτίβο),Αποδοχή,Διαφωτισμός (μοτίβο),Διελεύκανση (εγκληματολογία),Διαφωτισμός,Θεωρία των μονάδων,Μυστικισμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a B'ome, Jakob,1575-1624,Beme, Jakob,1575-1624,Bëme, Jakob,1575-1624,Philadelphus, Desiderius,1575-1624,Teutonicus Philosophus,1575-1624,Teutonicus,Philosophus,1575-1624,Teutonicus,Philosophicus,1575-1624,Böhmen, Jacob,1575-1624,Böhm, Jacob,1575-1624,Behme, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohmius, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohemus, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohemius, Jacobus,1575-1624,Bohmius, Iacobus,1575-1624,Böhme, Jacobus,1575-1624,J. B. T.,1575-1624,Böehme, Jakob,1575-1624,Bohme, Jacob,1575-1624,Desiderius,Philadelphus,1575-1624,Boehme, Jakob,1575-1624,Boehme, Jacob,1575-1624,Böhme, Giacomo,1575-1624,Behmen, Jacob,1575-1624,Beem, Jacob,1575-1624,Beme, Jacob,1575-1624,Boemus, Jacobus,1575-1624,Behme, Jacob,1575-1624,Behm, Jacob,1575-1624,Böhme, Jacob,1575-1624,Behman, Jacob,1575-1624,Teutonicus,1575-1624,Beme, Jacobus,1575-1624,Böhmen, Jakob,1575-1624,Böhm, J.,1575-1624,Behmen, Iacob,1575-1624,Bohmen, Jacob,1575-1624,Bêhme, Jacob,1575-1624 , Fortwirken,Nachwirkung,Nachleben,Wirkungsgeschichte,Aneignung , Leibnizius, Godefridus G.,1646-1716,Leibnizius, Godofredus G.,1646-1716,Leibnizius, Godfridus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnizius, Gottfredus G.,1646-1716,Leibniz, Godofredus G.,1646-1716,Leibniz, Goffredo Guglielmo,1646-1716,Leibniz, Goffredo G.,1646-1716,Leibniz, Gottfried W.,1646-1716,Leibniz, Gottfried G.,1646-1716,Leibniz, Guglielmo,1646-1716,Leibniz, G. Guglielmo,1646-1716,Leibnitii,1646-1716,Leibniz, Georg W.,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Godefredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Guillielmus G.,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Godofredus G.,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Godofridus G.,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Godefridus G.,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Gottefridus,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Gulielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitius, God. Guil.,1646-1716,Leibnitzius, Gothofredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitzius, Gotofredus Gulielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitzius, Godofredus G.,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Godofredus G. de,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Godofredus G.,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Gottfried W. von,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Gottfried W.,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Georg Wilhelm von,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Georgius Gulielmus von,1646-1716,Leibnuzius, Gottfredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnuzius, Gottfried W.,1646-1716,Leibnüz, Gottfried W.,1646-1716,Lejbnic, Gotfrid Vilʹgelʹm,1646-1716,Lejbnic, G. V.,1646-1716,Leibnics, Gotfrids Vilhelms,1646-1716,Leibnütz, Gottfrid Wilhelm,1646-1716,Leibnütz, Gottfried W.,1646-1716,Leibnütz, Guilelmus Gottofredus,1646-1716,Raibunittsu,1646-1716,Laipŭnitsŭ,1646-1716,L., G. G.,1646-1716,Caesarinus,Fürstenerius,1646-1716,Furstenerius, Caesarinus,1646-1716,Furstenerius, Caesarius,1646-1716,Fürstenerius, Caesarinus,1646-1716,Fürsteneer, Caesar,1646-1716,Lithuanus, Georgius Ulicovius,1646-1716,Lithuanus, Georgius U.,1646-1716,Lithvanus, Georgius V.,1646-1716,Pacidius, Wilhelm,1646-1716,Semper Sibisimilis,1646-1716,Leibnits, Gotfrid Vil'gel'm,1646-1716,Leibnitio, G. G.,1646-1716,Leibniz-Clarke,1646-1716,Gallo-Graecus, Germanus,1646-1716,Gallo-Graecus, Germano,1646-1716,Graecus, Germanus G.-,1646-1716,Justiniano, Veridicus de,1646-1716,Republicanus, Caesarinus Furstenerius,1646-1716,Freybach,1646-1716,Leibniz, Gottfried Wilheln,1646-1716,LaHontan de,1646-1716,La i peu ni cheu wa,1646-1716,Laipeunicheuwa,1646-1716,Leibnizius, Godofredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnizius, Gottfredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibniz, Godofredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibniz, Gotofredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibniz, Gottfried,1646-1716,Leibniz, G. W.,1646-1716,Leibniz,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Godofredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Gothofredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitzius, Godofredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Godofredus Guilielmus de,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Gottfried Wilhelm von,1646-1716,Leibnitz,1646-1716,Lajbnic, Gotfrid Vilhelm,1646-1716,Leibnuzius, Gottfried Wilhelm,1646-1716,Leibnüzius, Godofredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnüzius, Gottfredus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnüzius, Gottfried Wilhelm,1646-1716,Leibnüz, Gottfried Wilhelm,1646-1716,G. G. L.,1646-1716,G. G. L. L.,1646-1716,G. W. L.,1646-1716,Fuerstenerius, Caesarinus,1646-1716,Leibniz, Goffredo Guglielo,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Godofridus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Godefroy-Guillaume,1646-1716,Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von,1646-1716,Leibnizius, Godefridus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Godefridus Guilielmus,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Gottfried Wilhelm,1646-1716,Leibnizius, Gotfridus Guilelmus,1646-1716,Leibnitius, Gothofredus Guillelmus,1646-1716,Freiherr von Leibnitz, Gottfried Wilhelm,1646-1716,Leibniz, Georg Wilhelm,1646-1716,Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm,Freiherr von,1646-1716,Leibnitz, Georg Wilhelm,1646-1716,Laibnits, Goṭfrid Ṿilhelm,1646-1716,Laibnīz, Ǧūtfrīd Fīlhilm,1646-1716,Laibnīz, Ǧūtfrīd Fīlhalm,1646-1716 , Monadentheorie,Monadologie , Immerwährende Philosophie , Morell, André,1646-1703,Morel, Andreas,1646-1703,Morel, André,1646-1703,Morellus, Andreas,1646-1703,Morellius, Andreas,1646-1703,Morelli, André,1646-1703,Morelius, Andreas,1646-1703,Morelli, Andrea,1646-1703 , Verbrechensaufklärung,Straftat,Aufklärungszeitalter,Aufklärungszeit 
TIM |a 100016800101_100017901231  |b Aufklärung 1680-1790