The Voice of Conscience, Kierkegaard’s Theory of Indirect Communication, and Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue
This paper investigates the concept and the experience of conscience as an interface of aesthetic, ethical, and religious aspects of Kierkegaard’s existential approach, while criticizing his reductionist definition of ‘aesthetics’ and the opposition he draws between ethics and aesthetics. A comparis...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
De Gruyter
2017
|
| Dans: |
Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
Année: 2017, Volume: 2017, Numéro: 1, Pages: 363-378 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | AB Philosophie de la religion NBE Anthropologie NCA Éthique TJ Époque moderne TK Époque contemporaine |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This paper investigates the concept and the experience of conscience as an interface of aesthetic, ethical, and religious aspects of Kierkegaard’s existential approach, while criticizing his reductionist definition of ‘aesthetics’ and the opposition he draws between ethics and aesthetics. A comparison of Kierkegaard’s theory of indirect ‘existence’-communication with Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue shows that Kierkegaard overlooks three crucial moments of truly liberating, conscientious communication, including the dialogical dynamics of becoming-oneself vis-à-vis the Other. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1612-9792 |
| Contient: | In: Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2017-0015 |