The Voice of Conscience, Kierkegaard’s Theory of Indirect Communication, and Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue
This paper investigates the concept and the experience of conscience as an interface of aesthetic, ethical, and religious aspects of Kierkegaard’s existential approach, while criticizing his reductionist definition of ‘aesthetics’ and the opposition he draws between ethics and aesthetics. A comparis...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2017
|
En: |
Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
Año: 2017, Volumen: 2017, Número: 1, Páginas: 363-378 |
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AB Filosofía de la religión NBE Antropología NCA Ética TJ Edad Moderna TK Período contemporáneo |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Sumario: | This paper investigates the concept and the experience of conscience as an interface of aesthetic, ethical, and religious aspects of Kierkegaard’s existential approach, while criticizing his reductionist definition of ‘aesthetics’ and the opposition he draws between ethics and aesthetics. A comparison of Kierkegaard’s theory of indirect ‘existence’-communication with Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue shows that Kierkegaard overlooks three crucial moments of truly liberating, conscientious communication, including the dialogical dynamics of becoming-oneself vis-à-vis the Other. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1612-9792 |
Obras secundarias: | In: Kierkegaard studies / Yearbook
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2017-0015 |