The problem of invoking infinite polytheisms: a response to Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse
Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse present an argument which they think decisively demonstrates polytheism over monotheism, if theism is assumed. Far from being decisive, the argument depends on very controversial and likely false assumptions about how to treat infinities in probability. Moreover,...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
[2017]
|
| В: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Год: 2017, Том: 82, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 289-298 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Lataster, Raphael
/ Philipse, Herman 1951-
/ Политеизм
/ Монотеизм
|
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Theism
B PHILIPSE, Herman B Polytheism B Argument from infinitely many alternatives B Lataster, Raphael B Monotheism B Аргумент |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | Raphael Lataster and Herman Philipse present an argument which they think decisively demonstrates polytheism over monotheism, if theism is assumed. Far from being decisive, the argument depends on very controversial and likely false assumptions about how to treat infinities in probability. Moreover, these problems are well known. Here, we focus on three objections. First, the authors rely on both countable additivity and the Principle of Indifference, which contradict each other. Second, the authors rely on a particular way of dividing up the possibility space, when there are equally as reasonable alternative divisions which give different answers to the one the authors arrived at. Third, the authors' argument proves too much, giving us an argument against many positions we should not be able to argue against so easily. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8684 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11153-016-9585-y |
