Divine omniscience, privacy, and the state

Traditional theism teaches that God engages in a relentless form of observation for every human being. If, as is widely supposed, humans have a right to privacy, then it seems that God constantly violates this right. In this paper we argue that there is both a defensible philosophical excuse and jus...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Elliott, David S. (Author)
Outros Autores: Soifer, Eldon (Other)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publicado em: [2017]
Em: International journal for philosophy of religion
Ano: 2017, Volume: 82, Número: 3, Páginas: 251-271
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Onisciência / Esfera privada / Teoria política
Outras palavras-chave:B Ethics
B philosophy of religion
B Privacy
B Theism
B Religião Philosophy
B Political Philosophy
B RIGHT of privacy
B PRIVACY & ethics
Acesso em linha: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:Traditional theism teaches that God engages in a relentless form of observation for every human being. If, as is widely supposed, humans have a right to privacy, then it seems that God constantly violates this right. In this paper we argue that there is both a defensible philosophical excuse and justification for this infringement. We also argue that this defense is extensible to human social and political contexts; it provides the vital elements of a theory of just privacy infringement. This theory is broadly compatible both with major forms of political theory (except anarchistic ones) and with the main conceptions of privacy defended in recent philosophical and jurisprudential literature.
ISSN:1572-8684
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-017-9612-7