Human Autonomy and Theological Ethics
It is argued here that we have good reason to aspire to be autonomous in certain ways that deserve a place in the theory of virtue, but not in some of the ways that have figured most prominently in theories of moral obligation. This grounds an argument that the sorts of autonomy to which we have rea...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2016]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 8, Issue: 3, Pages: 3-20 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Free will
/ Theological ethics
/ Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804
/ Ethics
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NCB Personal ethics |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567183298 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220831091933.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180115s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v8i3.1665 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567183298 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497183293 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497183293 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)137441665 |0 (DE-627)592633594 |0 (DE-576)177121920 |4 aut |a Adams, Robert Merrihew |d 1937- | |
| 109 | |a Adams, Robert Merrihew 1937- |a Merrihew Adams, Robert 1937- |a Adams, R. M. 1937- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Human Autonomy and Theological Ethics |c Robert M. Adams |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a It is argued here that we have good reason to aspire to be autonomous in certain ways that deserve a place in the theory of virtue, but not in some of the ways that have figured most prominently in theories of moral obligation. This grounds an argument that the sorts of autonomy to which we have reason to aspire need not be enemies of theological ethics. The focus is on the relation of autonomy to obligation in sections 1-4, and on the relation of autonomy to love in section 5. | ||
| 601 | |a Autonomie | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 652 | |a AB:NCB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4079320-5 |0 (DE-627)106074733 |0 (DE-576)209212098 |2 gnd |a Willensfreiheit |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4078249-9 |0 (DE-627)106077953 |0 (DE-576)209207957 |2 gnd |a Theologische Ethik |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118559796 |0 (DE-627)133368785 |0 (DE-576)208982949 |2 gnd |a Kant, Immanuel |d 1724-1804 |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |0 (DE-627)106335987 |0 (DE-576)208912614 |2 gnd |a Ethik |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 8(2016), 3, Seite 3-20 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g pages:3-20 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1665 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v8i3.1665 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 8 |j 2016 |e 3 |h 3-20 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 299287700X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567183298 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180530151036 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052813 |a NCB | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Ethics,Ethics,Moral philosophy,Philosophical Ethics,Ethics,Free will,Free will,Will,Freedom of the will,Free agency,Theological ethics,Protestant ethics,Ethics |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Libre arbitre,Libre arbitre,Éthique théologique,Théologie morale,Éthique,Éthique,Morale,Morale,Morale |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Libre albedrío,Libre albedrío,Ética teológica,Ética,Ética,Ética moderna |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Etica teologica,Etica,Etica,Libero arbitrio,Libero arbitrio |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 伦理学,道德哲学,道德学,神学伦理,自由意志,自由意志,意志自由,意志自由 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 倫理學,道德哲學,道德學,神學倫理,自由意志,自由意志,意志自由,意志自由 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Livre arbítrio,Livre arbítrio,Ética teológica,Ética,Ética |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Богословская этика,Свобода воли (мотив),Свобода воли,Этика (мотив),Этика |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ελεύθερη βούληση <μοτίβο>,Ελεύθερη βούληση,Ελεύθερη θέληση,Ελεύθερη θέληση (μοτίβο),Ηθική (μοτίβο),Ηθική,Θεολογική ηθική |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Entscheidungsfreiheit,Freier Wille,Moralische Freiheit , Evangelische Ethik,Evangelische Moraltheologie,Evangelisch-theologische Ethik , Kant, Imānūīl,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuïl,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuelʹ,1724-1804,Kant, Immānū'ēl,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuell,1724-1804,Kant, Immanowel,1724-1804,Kantius,1724-1804,Kanto, Imanueru,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿImānūʾīl,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿAmānūʾīl,1724-1804,Ḳanṭ, ʿImanuʾel,1724-1804,Kānṭ, ʿAmmānūʾīl,1724-1804,Cant,1724-1804,Kanti, Imanuel,1724-1804,Kants, Imanuels,1724-1804,Kants, Immanuēls,1724-1804,Kantas, I.,1724-1804,Kantas, Imanuelis,1724-1804,Pseudo-Kant,1724-1804,Yi man nu er Kang de,1724-1804,Yimannuer-Kangde,1724-1804,Kangde, Yimannuer,1724-1804,Kang de,1724-1804,Kangde,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuil,1724-1804,Kant, Imm.,1724-1804,Kant, Inmanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Manuel,1724-1804,Kant,1724-1804,Qanṭ, Immānū'ēl,1724-1804,Kanto,1724-1804,K'ang-tê, I.,1724-1804,K'ang-tê,1724-1804,Kānt,1724-1804,Kānṭ, Imainual,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuïl,1724-1804,Kānt, ʿImānūīl,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuwil,1724-1804,Kant, Immanual,1724-1804,Kant, Immanuell,1724-1804,Kanto, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuel,1724-1804,Kant, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Emanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Emanuele,1724-1804,Kant, Emmanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Emmanuele,1724-1804,Kant, E.,1724-1804,Kant, Manuele,1724-1804,Kant, M.,1724-1804,Kantius, Immanuel,1724-1804,Kant, Imanuil,1724-1804,Kant, Amanuil,1724-1804,K`ant`u,1724-1804,Canto, I.,1724-1804,Kant, Im.,1724-1804,Kant, `Imanu'el,1724-1804,Kānt, `Ammānūʹīl,1724-1804,Kant, IImmanuil,1724-1804,Kant,1724-1804,Kantius, Immanowel,1724-1804,Kant, Imainual,1724-1804,K`ang-te,1724-1804,Кант, И.,1724-1804,Кант, Иммануел,1724-1804 , Ethics,Moral,Morality,Moralphilosophie,Tugend,Wertethik,Ethische Theorie,Moral,Philosophische Ethik,Sittenlehre,Moralphilosophie |