Time, Truth, Actuality, and Causation: On the Impossibility of Divine Foreknowledge

In this essay, my goal is, first, to describe the most important contemporary philosophical approaches to the nature of time, and then, secondly, to discuss the ways in which those different accounts bear upon the question of the possibility of divine foreknowledge. I shall argue that different acco...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tooley, Michael (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2010]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2010, Volume: 2, Issue: 1, Pages: 143-163
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1567182836
003 DE-627
005 20180115170207.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180115s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.v2i1.355  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1567182836 
035 |a (DE-576)497182831 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497182831 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Tooley, Michael  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Time, Truth, Actuality, and Causation  |b On the Impossibility of Divine Foreknowledge  |c Michael Tooley 
264 1 |c [2010] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this essay, my goal is, first, to describe the most important contemporary philosophical approaches to the nature of time, and then, secondly, to discuss the ways in which those different accounts bear upon the question of the possibility of divine foreknowledge. I shall argue that different accounts of the nature of time give rise to different objections to the idea of divine foreknowledge, but that, in addition, there is a general argument for the impossibility of divine foreknowledge that is independent of one’s account of the nature of time. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 2(2010), 1, Seite 143-163  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:2  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:143-163 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1636901352  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/TOOTTA-2.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/355  |x Verlag  |z teilw. kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v2i1.355  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2992876496 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1567182836 
LOK |0 005 20180115170207 
LOK |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL