A Defense of First and Second-Order Theism: the limits of empirical inquiry and the rationality of religious belief

We argue that the use of the term “supernatural” is problematic in philosophy of religion in general, and in the contribution by Thornhill-Miller and Millican (TMM) in particular. We address the disturbing parallel between Hume’s case against the rationality of belief in miracles and his dismissal o...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taliaferro, Charles 1952- (Author)
Contributors: Porot, Christophe (Other)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2016]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 8, Issue: 3, Pages: 213-235
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Theism / Supranaturalism
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NAA Systematic theology
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1567182763
003 DE-627
005 20180614101328.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180115s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.v8i3.1695  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1567182763 
035 |a (DE-576)497182769 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497182769 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)14178508X  |0 (DE-627)631192840  |0 (DE-576)173166539  |4 aut  |a Taliaferro, Charles  |d 1952- 
109 |a Taliaferro, Charles 1952-  |a Taliaferro, C. 1952- 
245 1 2 |a A Defense of First and Second-Order Theism  |b the limits of empirical inquiry and the rationality of religious belief  |c Charles Taliaferro, St. Olaf College & Christophe Porot, Harvard University 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a We argue that the use of the term “supernatural” is problematic in philosophy of religion in general, and in the contribution by Thornhill-Miller and Millican (TMM) in particular. We address the disturbing parallel between Hume’s case against the rationality of belief in miracles and his dismissal of reports of racial equality. We do not argue that because Hume was a racist (or an advocate of white superiority) therefore his view against miracles is faulty, but we draw attention to how Hume sets up a framework that, for similar reasons, discounts evidence of black intelligence and divine intelligence (or evidence of acts of God). We go on to argue against TMM’s revision of Hume on miracles. We then argue that empirical testing on the veracity of petitionary belief is impossible for there is no control case (everyone is prayed for) and that empirical testing can no more evaluate the evidential merits of most religious experiences than it can assess the merits of any robust philosophical position in epistemology, metaphysics, value theory, logic and mathematics. We express doubts about the integrity and scope of how one might enjoy the good of religion without belief. In a final section we offer a defense of the rationality of believing in specific religious traditions based on religious experience along with what we refer to as sufficient philosophical reasoning. 
652 |a AB:NAA 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059729-5  |0 (DE-627)10614250X  |0 (DE-576)209131942  |2 gnd  |a Theismus 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4998275-8  |0 (DE-627)504486853  |0 (DE-576)253203600  |2 gnd  |a Supranaturalismus 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
700 1 |a Porot, Christophe  |4 oth 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 8(2016), 3, Seite 213-235  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:8  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g pages:213-235 
856 4 0 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1695  |x Verlag  |z teilw. kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v8i3.1695  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2992876429 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1567182763 
LOK |0 005 20180530171407 
LOK |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442050780  |a NAA 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Supranaturalism,Theism 
STB 0 0 |a Surnaturalisme,Théisme 
STC 0 0 |a Supranaturalismo,Teísmo 
STD 0 0 |a Soprannaturalismo,Teismo 
STE 0 0 |a 有神论,超自然主义 
STF 0 0 |a 有神論,超自然主義 
STG 0 0 |a Supranaturalismo,Teísmo 
STH 0 0 |a Супранатурализм,Теизм 
STI 0 0 |a Θεϊσμός,Υπερφυσικό 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Supernaturalismus