Craigs Nominalism and the High Cost of Preserving Divine Aseity
William Lane Craig rejects Platonism (the view that uncreated abstract objects (AOs) exist) in favor of nominalism because he believes Platonism fatally compromises Gods aseity. For Craig, concrete particulars (including essences) exist, but properties do not. Yet, we use property-talk, following C...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2017]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 9, Issue: 1, Pages: 87-107 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Craig, William Lane 1949-
/ Nominalism
/ God
/ Aseity of God
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |