Craigs Nominalism and the High Cost of Preserving Divine Aseity
William Lane Craig rejects Platonism (the view that uncreated abstract objects (AOs) exist) in favor of nominalism because he believes Platonism fatally compromises Gods aseity. For Craig, concrete particulars (including essences) exist, but properties do not. Yet, we use property-talk, following C...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2017]
|
| В: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Год: 2017, Том: 9, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 87-107 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Craig, William Lane 1949-
/ Номинализм
/ Бог (мотив)
/ Самозарождение Бога
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567182607 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180604230006.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180115s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v9i1.1866 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567182607 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497182602 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497182602 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1074479785 |0 (DE-627)832257885 |0 (DE-576)442707134 |4 aut |a Smith, R. Scott | |
| 109 | |a Smith, R. Scott | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Craigs Nominalism and the High Cost of Preserving Divine Aseity |c R. Scott Smith |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a William Lane Craig rejects Platonism (the view that uncreated abstract objects (AOs) exist) in favor of nominalism because he believes Platonism fatally compromises Gods aseity. For Craig, concrete particulars (including essences) exist, but properties do not. Yet, we use property-talk, following Carnaps linguistic frameworks. There is, however, a high cost to Craigs view. I survey his views and then explore the importance of essences. But, next, I show that his nominalism undermines them. Thus, we have just interpretations of reality. Worse, nominalism undermines creations determinacy. Last, I suggest AOs are created, but in a more fundamental sense than Craig considers. | ||
| 652 | |a AB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)123518385 |0 (DE-627)035334142 |0 (DE-576)160636663 |2 gnd |a Craig, William Lane |d 1949- |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4171977-3 |0 (DE-627)105390569 |0 (DE-576)209940344 |2 gnd |a Nominalismus |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4021662-7 |0 (DE-627)104649747 |0 (DE-576)208939261 |2 gnd |a Gott |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4500882-6 |0 (DE-627)700428216 |0 (DE-576)212925393 |2 gnd |a Aseität Gottes |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 9(2017), 1, Seite 87-107 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:87-107 |
| 856 | |u https://philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/download/1866/1499 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1866 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v9i1.1866 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2992876259 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567182607 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180604163736 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Aseity of God,God,God,God,Nominalism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Aséité de Dieu,Dieu,Dieu,Nominalisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Aseidad de Dios,Dios,Dios,Nominalismo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Aseità di Dio,Dio,Dio,Nominalismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 唯名论,神,神,上帝,上帝,神的自存,神的自含 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 唯名論,神,神,上帝,上帝,神的自存,神的自含 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Aseidade de Deus,Deus,Deus,Nominalismo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Номинализм,Самозарождение Бога |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Αυθυπαρξία του Θεού,Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Νομιναλισμός,Ονοματοκρατία |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Craig, William L.,1949-,Lane Craig, William,1949- , Playing God , Autusie Gottes,Selbstgrund Gottes,Selbstwirklichkeit Gottes |