Worst Friends or Best Enemies?
This article examines the question of whether the atheist and the believer can understand each other, to the point of being friends intellectually. The answer is no. The atheist and the believer can be best enemies, but their epistemic disagreement is definitely radical. For it is not a disagreement...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
[2015]
|
| В: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Год: 2015, Том: 7, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 105-120 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Неверующий (мотив)
/ Вера (мотив)
/ Межчеловеческие отношения (мотив)
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
| Итог: | This article examines the question of whether the atheist and the believer can understand each other, to the point of being friends intellectually. The answer is no. The atheist and the believer can be best enemies, but their epistemic disagreement is definitely radical. For it is not a disagreement on religious belief itself, but about what allows the believer to believe. The article examines some aspects of John Grecos concept of friendly theism, the discussion of conciliationism and anti-conciliatonism, and the epistemic role of the Holy Spirit. |
|---|---|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v7i1.132 |
