On Second-Order Religion, Agatheism and Naturalism. A Reply to Branden Thornhill-Miller, Peter Millican and Janusz Salamon
These comments, on the paper by Branden Thornhill-Miller and Peter Millican 1 and on the critique of that paper by Janusz Salamon 2 , divide into four sections. In the first two sections, I briefly sketch some of the major themes from the paper by Thornhill-Miller and Millican, and then from the cri...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2016]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 8, Issue: 3, Pages: 257-272 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Naturalism (Philosophy)
/ Religion
/ Nachrangigkeit
/ Theism
/ The Good
|
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1567181902 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180614101303.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180115s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v8i3.1697 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1567181902 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)497181908 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497181908 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Oppy, Graham |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a On Second-Order Religion, Agatheism and Naturalism. A Reply to Branden Thornhill-Miller, Peter Millican and Janusz Salamon |c Graham Oppy |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a These comments, on the paper by Branden Thornhill-Miller and Peter Millican 1 and on the critique of that paper by Janusz Salamon 2 , divide into four sections. In the first two sections, I briefly sketch some of the major themes from the paper by Thornhill-Miller and Millican, and then from the critique by Salamon. In the final two sections, I provide some critical thoughts on Salamons objections to Thornhill-Miller and Millican, and then on the leading claims made by Thornhill-Miller and Millican. I find much to commend, but also some things to dispute, in both papers. As is so often the way, I shall focus on areas of disagreement. | ||
652 | |a AB | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4171303-5 |0 (DE-627)105395846 |0 (DE-576)209936037 |2 gnd |a Naturalismus |g Philosophie |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4426210-3 |0 (DE-627)216499593 |0 (DE-576)212324616 |2 gnd |a Nachrangigkeit |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4022600-1 |0 (DE-627)106307991 |0 (DE-576)208944702 |2 gnd |a Das Gute |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 8(2016), 3, Seite 257-272 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g pages:257-272 |
856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/OPPOSR.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/1697 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v8i3.1697 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
936 | u | w | |d 8 |j 2016 |e 3 |h 257-272 |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 299287552X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1567181902 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20180530172100 | ||
LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion,The Good,Good and evil,Theism |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Le bien,Bien (philosophie),Religion,Religions,Religion,Théisme |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Lo bien,Religión,Religión,Religión,Teísmo |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Il bene,Religione,Religione,Religione,Teismo |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,有神论,那 好的,那 美善的,那 善的 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,有神論,那 好的,那 美善的,那 善的 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a O bem,Religião,Religião,Teísmo |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Добро,Религия,Религия (мотив),Теизм |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θεϊσμός,Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Το Καλό |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Nachrang , Gutes |