Survivalism, Corruptionism, and Mereology

Corruptionism is the view that following physical death, the human being ceases to exist (until resurrection) but their soul persists in the afterlife. Survivalism holds that both the human being and their soul persist in the afterlife, as distinct entities, with the soul constituting the human. Eac...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oderberg, David S. 1963- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: [2012]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2012, Volume: 4, Issue: 4, Pages: 1-26
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1567181856
003 DE-627
005 20250319005333.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180115s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.v4i4.257  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1567181856 
035 |a (DE-576)497181851 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497181851 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |8 1\p  |0 (DE-588)1049182286  |0 (DE-627)781299802  |0 (DE-576)171542045  |4 aut  |a Oderberg, David S.  |d 1963- 
109 |a Oderberg, David S. 1963- 
245 1 0 |a Survivalism, Corruptionism, and Mereology  |c David S. Oderberg 
264 1 |c [2012] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Corruptionism is the view that following physical death, the human being ceases to exist (until resurrection) but their soul persists in the afterlife. Survivalism holds that both the human being and their soul persist in the afterlife, as distinct entities, with the soul constituting the human. Each position has its defenders, most of whom appeal both to metaphysical considerations and to the authority of St Thomas Aquinas. Corruptionists claim that survivalism violates a basic principle of any plausible mereology, while survivalists tend to reject the principle, though without as much detail as one would like. In this paper I examine both the key exegetical issues and the mereological question, arguing (i) that Aquinas cannot be shown to have supported the principle in question, and (ii) that the principle should be rejected on independent grounds. If correct, some key planks in support of survivalism are established, with others to await further examination. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 4(2012), 4, Seite 1-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:4  |g year:2012  |g number:4  |g pages:1-26 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1636984827  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/257/228  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/257  |x Verlag  |z teilw. kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v4i4.257  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
883 |8 1  |a cgwrk  |d 20250301  |q DE-101  |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2992875473 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1567181856 
LOK |0 005 20180115170112 
LOK |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL