New Puzzles about Divine Attributes

According to traditional Western theism, God is maximally great (or perfect). more explicitly, God is said to have the following divine attributes: omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence. In this paper, I present three puzzles about this conception of a maximally great (or perfect) being. The...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mizrahi, Moti (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2013]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 147-157
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1567181643
003 DE-627
005 20180115170102.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180115s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.v5i2.238  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1567181643 
035 |a (DE-576)497181649 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497181649 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mizrahi, Moti  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a New Puzzles about Divine Attributes  |c Moti Mizrahi 
264 1 |c [2013] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to traditional Western theism, God is maximally great (or perfect). more explicitly, God is said to have the following divine attributes: omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence. In this paper, I present three puzzles about this conception of a maximally great (or perfect) being. The first puzzle about omniscience shows that this divine attribute is incoherent. The second puzzle about omnibenevolence and omnipotence shows that these divine attributes are logically incompatible. The third puzzle about perfect rationality and omnipotence shows that these divine attributes are logically incompatible. 
601 |a Attribution 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 5(2013), 2, Seite 147-157  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2013  |g number:2  |g pages:147-157 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1637043163  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/238/207  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/238  |x Verlag  |z teilw. kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v5i2.238  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 5  |j 2013  |e 2  |h 147-157 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2992875309 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1567181643 
LOK |0 005 20180115170102 
LOK |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL