A Cosmo-Ontological Argument for the Existence of a First Cause - Perhaps God
The paper presents a new version of the "Cosmological Argument" - considered to be an ontological argument, since it exclusively uses ontological concepts and principles. It employs famous results of modern physics, and distinguishes between event-causation and agent-causation. Due to thes...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2012]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2012, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 169-178 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1567181562 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180115170057.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180115s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v4i2.302 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1567181562 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)497181568 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ497181568 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Meixner, Uwe |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Cosmo-Ontological Argument for the Existence of a First Cause - Perhaps God |c Uwe Meixner |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2012] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The paper presents a new version of the "Cosmological Argument" - considered to be an ontological argument, since it exclusively uses ontological concepts and principles. It employs famous results of modern physics, and distinguishes between event-causation and agent-causation. Due to these features, the argument manages to avoid the objection of infinite regress. It remains true, however, that the conclusion of the argument (just like the conclusion of Thomas Aquinass causal argument) is too unspecific to be unambiguously considered an argument for the existence of God. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 4(2012), 2, Seite 169-178 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2012 |g number:2 |g pages:169-178 |
| 856 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/download/302/277 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/302 |x Verlag |z teilw. kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v4i2.302 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2992875228 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1567181562 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180115170057 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||