Four (Or So) New Fine-Tuning Arguments
Both proponents and opponents of the argument for the deliberate fine-tuning, by an intelligent agent, of the fundamental constants of the universe have accepted certain assumptions about how the argument will go. These include both treating the fine-tuning of the constants as constitutive of the na...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
[2016]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Jahr: 2016, Band: 8, Heft: 2, Seiten: 85-106 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Kosmologie
/ Fundamentalkonstante
/ Intelligent Design
|
IxTheo Notationen: | AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus |
Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei) |
Zusammenfassung: | Both proponents and opponents of the argument for the deliberate fine-tuning, by an intelligent agent, of the fundamental constants of the universe have accepted certain assumptions about how the argument will go. These include both treating the fine-tuning of the constants as constitutive of the nature of the universe itself and conditioning on the fact that the constants actually do fall into the life-permitting range, rather than on the narrowness of the range. It is also generally assumed that the fine-tuning argument should precede biological arguments for design from, e.g., the origin of life. I suggest four new arguments, two of which are different orderings of the same data. Each of these abandons one or more of the common assumptions about how the fine-tuning argument should go, and they provide new possibilities for answering or avoiding objections to the fine-tuning argument. |
---|---|
Enthält: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v8i2.59 |