Religious Pluralism and the Buridan's Ass Paradox

The paradox of Buridan’s Ass involves an animal facing two equally adequate and attractive alternatives, such as would happen were a hungry ass to confront two bales of hay that are equal in all respects relevant to the ass’s hunger. Of course, the ass will eat from one rather than the other, becaus...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kvanvig, Jonathan L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham [2009]
In: European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2009, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-26
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (teilw. kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1567181252
003 DE-627
005 20180115170042.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 180115s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.24204/ejpr.v1i1.327  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1567181252 
035 |a (DE-576)497181258 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ497181258 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kvanvig, Jonathan L.  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Religious Pluralism and the Buridan's Ass Paradox  |c Jonathan L. Kvanvig 
264 1 |c [2009] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The paradox of Buridan’s Ass involves an animal facing two equally adequate and attractive alternatives, such as would happen were a hungry ass to confront two bales of hay that are equal in all respects relevant to the ass’s hunger. Of course, the ass will eat from one rather than the other, because the alternative is to starve. But why does this eating happen? What reason is operative, and what explanation can be given as to why the ass eats from, say, the left bale rather than the right bale? Why doesn’t the ass remain caught between the options, forever indecisive and starving to death? Religious pluralists face a similar dilemma, a dilemma that I will argue is more difficult to address than the paradox just described. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal for philosophy of religion  |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009  |g 1(2009), 1, Seite 1-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718600770  |w (DE-600)2659606-4  |w (DE-576)477533728  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2009  |g number:1  |g pages:1-26 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1636885187  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |u https://philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/download/327/305  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/327  |x Verlag  |z teilw. kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v1i1.327  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 1  |j 2009  |e 1  |h 1-26 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2992874922 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1567181252 
LOK |0 005 20180115170042 
LOK |0 008 180115||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL