Origen’s Vacillating Stances toward his “Valentinian” Colleague Heracleon
When Origen of Alexandria presents numerous extensive quotations from Heracleon, whom he explicitly presents as a follower of Valentinus, one might expect a uniformly adversarial attitude toward this “Valentinian” sectarian. Instead, Origen’s stances are found to vacillate significantly from general...
| Publicado en: | Vigiliae Christianae |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Brill
2017
|
| En: |
Vigiliae Christianae
Año: 2017, Volumen: 71, Número: 5, Páginas: 541-569 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | BF Gnosis HC Nuevo Testamento KAB Cristianismo primitivo |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Gospel of John
reception history
Valentinian exegesis
Patristic exegesis
Greek philology
Gnosticism
|
| Acceso en línea: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
| Sumario: | When Origen of Alexandria presents numerous extensive quotations from Heracleon, whom he explicitly presents as a follower of Valentinus, one might expect a uniformly adversarial attitude toward this “Valentinian” sectarian. Instead, Origen’s stances are found to vacillate significantly from general renunciation and emphatic criticism, via considered disagreement and hypothetical approval, all the way to agreement and praise. The fascinating interplay between the stance taken and the dogmatic and philological matters in view implies that while dogmatic issues at stake are decisive for whether Origen agrees or disagrees with Heracleon, the full range of variance in Origen’s stances is determined by Heracleon’s philological methodology and presentation of evidence. Origen’s responses to Heracleon reveal that he viewed this predecessor not simply as a heterodox teacher, but also as a colleague in interpreting the New Testament using methods from Greco-Roman literary criticism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0720 |
| Obras secundarias: | In: Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341318 |